Rethinking curriculum in the linguistics component of a major on bilingual education

Carlos Arias-Cepeda, Sandra Rojas

Abstract


The aim of this article is to report the partial findings resulting from a phenomenological study that intends to document the theoretical and empirical sources to inform a curricular proposal for the linguistic component of a major on bilingual education. From the theoretical point of view, this paper will present several perspectives about curriculum in tertiary education and the role of linguistics in a major on bilingual education. As for the empirical data, the paper will document how some professors in the second language teaching and linguistics fields, when analyzing the linguistic component of the curriculum in the major, advocate for a conscious use of metalanguage, the choice of content that empower student teachers to build their praxis and compete in their field,  the use of the first and second language for instruction, and a switch towards the problemic nature of the object of study rather than the subdiscipline fragmentation of knowledge. This paper also triangulates some of the participants’ perspectives with existing theory in an attempt to reach more informed grounds for a curricular proposal.


Keywords


linguistics, curriculum; bilingual education; tertiary education

Full Text:

PDF (Español)

References


Baker, C. (2006). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Bartels, N. (2005). Applied linguistics and language teacher education: What we know. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics and teacher education (387-404). New York: Springer.

Bentolila,S.,Pedranzani, B., & Clavijo, M. (2007). El campo de la formación universitaria: rasgos y contornos de los cambios del curriculum en un contexto de crisis estructural. Fundamentos en humanidades, 2 (16) 67- 95.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (5th ed.) Maidenhead, UK: The society for research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. C. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2000). Intelectuales, política y poder. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.

Bourdieu, P. (2003). Campo de poder y campo intelectual. Itinerario de un concepto. Buenos Aires, Quadrata editorial.

Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.

Brown, B. A. (2006). “It isn’t no slang that can be said about this stuff”: Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 96 – 126

Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004) What’s so good about Problem- based learning? Cognition and Instruction 22 (1) : 61-79.

CEPAL- UNESCO (1992). Educación y conocimiento: Eje de la transformación productiva con equidad. Santiago de Chile.

Claussen, S., & Osborne, J. (2013). Bourdieu's notion of cultural capital and its implications for the science curriculum. Science Education, 97 (1) 58–79.

Correa, M. (2014). Teaching (Theoretical) linguistics in the second language classroom: Beyond language improvement. Porta Languarium 22, 161- 171.

Cortés L, Cardenas M, Nieto M. (2013). Competencias del profesor de lenguas extranjeras: creencias de la comunidad educativa. Colección dirección de investigación sede Bogotá. Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Cots, J. & Arnó, E. (2005). Integrating language teachers’ discipline knowledge in a language course. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics and teacher education (59-78). New York: Springer.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: CA. Sag Publications, Inc.

Delors, J. (1996) La educación encierra un tesoro. Madrid: Santillana/ UNESCO

Díaz, A. (2003). La investigación curricular en México. La década de los noventa. México: Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa.

Doughty, C. (2003). Effects of instruction on learning a second language: A critique of instructed SLA research. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, & S. Rott (eds.), Form Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 181–202) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dussel, I. (2005). Las políticas curriculares de la última década en América Latina: Nuevos actores, nuevos problemas. In : Fundación Santillana (ed.). Educación de calidad para todos: Iniciativas iberoamericanas. Madrid: Santillana, p. 297-305.

Ellis, R. (2007). Explicit form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. In B. Spolsky & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 437–455). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwel

Ellis, E. (2012). Language awareness and its relevance to TESOL. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL 7, 1-23

Englund, T., & Quennerstedt, A (2008) Linking curriculum theory and linguistics: the performative use of ‘equivalence’ as an education policy concept. Curriculum studies 40 (6) 713-724

Fenwick, L., Humphrey, S., Quinn, M., & Endicott, M. (2013).

Developing deep understanding about language in undergraduate pre-service teacher programs through the application of knowledge. Australian journal of teacher education. 39-1, 1- 39.

Foucault, M. (2006) Seguridad, Territorio, Población. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Fraser, S., & Bosanquet, A. (2006) The Curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? Studies in Higher Education, 31 (3), 269-284.

García, J., & Malagón, L. (2010). ¿Por qué las políticas y reformas curriculares tienen un éxito limitado? El caso del constructivismo y la educación basada en competencias. Revista Perspectivas Educativas, 3, 251-262.

Gimeno, J & Pérez, A. (2008). La enseñanza: su teoría y su práctica. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.

Gomes de Matos, F (2014). Peace linguistics for language teachers. D.E.L.T.A., 30.2, 2014 (415-424).

Gónzalez, S. (2015). Justicia Epistemológica: Escuchando al Sur. Nuevos desafío para la inclusión social y la equidad en instituciones de educación superior. In M. Rifa, L. Duarte, & M. Ponferrada (Eds.), Nuevos desafíos para la inclusión social y la equidad en instituciones de educación superior. Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica.

Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: product or praxis? Lewes: Falmer Press.

Jenkins, R. (2002). Pierre Bourdieu. New York: Routledge.

Jiménez, J. (2011). Lingüística general I. Guía docente. Editorial Club universitario. Alicante, España.

Johnson, K. & Golombek, P (Eds) (2002) Teachers’ narrative inquiry as professional development. New York: Cambridge university press.

Johnston, B. and Goettsch, K. (2000) In search of the knowledge base of language teaching: Explanations by experienced teachers. Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 56, 3: 437-468.

Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. Routledge.

Jurado, F. (2014). Formación de Maestros. Entrevista UN Análisis. Emisora de la Universidad Nacional. 20 de Mayo de 2014.

Kabatek, J (2014) Lingüística empática. Rilce, 30 (3) 705-723.

Kridel, C. (2010) Encyclopedia of Curriculum Studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.

LaFond, L., & Dogancay-Aktuna, S. (2009) Teacher perspectives on linguistics in TESOL education. Language Awareness 18 (3) 345-365.

Lundgreen, U. P. (1992). Teoría del currículum y la socialización. España: Morata.

McKay, S. and Hornberger, N. (Eds). (1996) Sociolinguistics and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (2006) Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

McEneaney, E. (2003). The worlwide cachet of scientific literacy. Comparative Education Review, 47(2), 217-237.

Murphy, J. & Adams, JE. (1998) Reforming America's schools 1980-2000. Journal of Educational Administration, 36, 5, p. 426-44.

O’Neill, G. (2015). Curriculum design in higher education: Theory to Practice. Dublin: UCD Teaching & Learning.

Pastor C. (2001). La formación lingüística del profesorado de segundas lenguas. Analele stiintifice ale univeristatii de stat de Moldov., (Anales científicos de la universidad de Moldavia, ciencias filológicas).Universidad de Chisinau (Moldavia) (1), 134-136.

Pennycook, A. (2001).Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Popkewitz, T. (2014). Social Epistemology, the Reason of “Reason” and the Curriculum Studies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 22.

Posner, G. (2005). Análisis del currículo. México: McGraw Hill.

Rasool, N. (2004). Sustaining Linguistic Diversity within the Global Cultural Economy: Issues of Language Rights and Linguistic Possibilities. Comparative Education, 40 (2), 199-214.

Seedhouse, P. (1995) Needs analysis and the general English classroom. ELT Journal 49, 59- 65

Treffes- Daller, J. (2003) Variation in teaching: two perspectives on teaching linguistics. LLAS Ocassional Papers, 12- 14.

Widdowson, H (2000) Object language and the language subject: On the mediating role of applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20, 21- 33.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26817%2F16925777.361

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License” style=
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 

ISSN (1692-5777) Print

ISSN (2248-8391) Online 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26817/issn.1692-5777